said on August 24th, 2009 categorized under: Tax Credits
Comment
On my way in to the office, I pass several auto dealerships.
This morning, I couldn’t help but notice big rows of older cars line up along the back of the lots; the clunkers brought in as the part of the government’s “cash for clunkers” program, which ends tonight.
There were a lot of them.
I wondered what the weekend was like for the car dealers; whether they’d had a chance to sleep or eat, and if they had a line of people waiting to talk with them.
And when I read Ken Harney’s column in the Washington Post questioning whether Congresss would extend the $8000 first time home buyer tax credit, I imagined a line of buyers at the door of local real estate broker’s offices as the November 30 deadline approaches.
There are 14 weeks left. As most real estate transactions take, on average, 45 to 60 days to close (six to eight weeks), there are, for all intents and purposes, just six weeks to go.
I realize that sounds like a lot of time. However, anyone who’s been out there looking can tell you, good properties can be hard to find.
So will Congress extend the deadline like they did with the clunkers program? Hard to tell. They have plenty on their plate already when they return from summer break; including the not-so-small matter of health care reform.
According to Harney, there are already bills pending in both the House and Senate to extend the credit for another year.
Meanwhile, Senators Christopher Dodd (D-Conn) and Johnny Isakson (R- Georgia) are co-sponsoring a bill that would eliminate the income restrictions on the credit, raise it to a maximum of $15,0000 and extend it to all home buyers.
It all sounds exciting. However, it’s important to remember the tax credit ultimately ends up costing the government lost revenue. As the federal budget is already deeply in the red, there may be more than a little resistance.
So are they going to extend or expand the credit?
Don’t count on it. It is Washington, after all.
said on July 23rd, 2009 categorized under: Tenants
Comment
The Minnesota Multi-Housing Association should hire Belinda Jensen.
I don’t think she knows a thing about renting or owning duplexes. But I think a storm’s a comin’, and somebody needs to forecast it.
So I will.
There’s a tornado on the horizon for Minneapolis/St Paul duplex owners and landlords.
It’s a great big, dark, ominous-looking vacancy rate resulting from the $8000 first time home buyer tax credit.
I can’t even tell you how many people I’ve spoken with in open houses and general conversations who a) are planning on taking advantage of the tax credit and b) are on month-to-month leases.
As the tax credit expires November 30, 2009, how many move-out notices do you think landlords will receive on October 30?
I’m guessing about 17 inches worth.
While it’s always wise to keep your tenant’s leases current, it is especially important to make sure you have them under contract now.
If you don’t, I’m predicting a long, cold winter.
Comment

The other day I sent a listing for a four-plex to a client. While he’s not actively looking, and this one wasn’t an especially good deal, it reminded me in both appearance and location of one of the ones he already owns.
My client has invested and occupied income properties for many years. And he asked whether he was correct in not seeing the precipitous price drops in the four unit buildings that are occurring in the duplex market.
Yes and no.
Remember that old law of supply and demand? How if the demand for a product is greater, the price goes up? Well, this law applies when it comes to small multi-family properties (one to four units) as easily as everything else.
While FHA loans are available for duplexes, tri-plexes and four-plexes, most owner-occupants simply prefer duplexes. And while the amount of rent the other unit generates still played a role in a purchase, it didn’t carry nearly the weight of the more emotional nature of buying a home to live in. The duplexes that triggered those feelings typically sold for the higher prices that emotions always command. Consequently, they also rode the great wave of appreciation.
Well, aren’t there four-plexes with charm? Of course! But the prospect of coming home to three tenants with issues was and is, to many, far more daunting than the thought of simply one renter. This higher level of demand helped drive up prices during the boom years.