Minneapolis Mayoral Election Could Decide Rent Control

This year’s Minneapolis mayoral contest could determine whether the city ever implements a binding rent-control ordinance or keeps the veto pen handy.

And while incumbent Mayor Jacob Frey certainly has his detractors for a variety of reasons, he has consistently been a friend to housing providers.

Here are the candidates and where they stand on policies like rent control, vacancy decontrol. TOPA and Just Cause Evictions.

Jacob Frey (incumbent)

• Longtime opponent of rent control. Prefers production, public subsidies, and the “4d” property-tax incentive for keeping units affordable.
• Has veto power over any future rent-control ordinance—and has a history of using it.
• Has previously opposed TOPA. Prefers solving housing issues with increased supply.

Omar Fateh

• The strongest pro-tenant candidate in the race. Backs rent stabilization with new-construction exemptions, , and city-supported social housing. Has stated he would consider rent freezes. His positions on TOPA are unknown.

DeWayne Davis

• More middle-of-the-road: open to a measured stabilization program as part of a bigger housing plan emphasizing production and preservation.

Jazz Hampton

• Opposes strict caps but supports anti-gouging tools and more legal protections for renters.

Howard Dotson & Xavier Pauke

• Back stronger rent-control mechanisms and broader social-housing investments.

In an October debate, Frey, Davis, and Hampton all opposed capping rent increases, while Fateh reaffirmed his commitment to pushing rent control forward.

Remember, the mayor can veto any rent control proposal the city council puts forth. In order for it to be put on the ballot for voters to decide, the council would need to have enough votes to override the veto.

Elections have consequences. Make sure you vote on November 4th.